TV

What Landman gets wrong: Newsweek and a Texas trade group both published point-by-point rebuttals

What Landman gets wrong: Newsweek and a Texas trade group both published point-by-point rebuttals
Image credit: Google Veo 3

What does Landman get wrong about oil, wind power, and actual landmen? Newsweek's expert fact-check and the Fort Worth landmen's association reviewed it point by point.

Landman has an unusual distinction among Taylor Sheridan shows: it 's been formally fact-checked twice — once by Newsweek's fact-check desk, once, episode by episode, by the actual trade association for landmen, headquartered in Fort Worth. The two reviews came from opposite directions and agreed on the main point: it's a drama, and it drifts.

Newsweek vs. the wind turbine monologue

The scene in question is season 1, episode 3 — Tommy Norris (Billy Bob Thornton) stands next to a wind turbine and tells attorney Rebecca Falcone that in its 20-year lifespan it will never offset the carbon cost of building it. The clip went viral within days of the show's November 2024 debut.

Newsweek's December 2024 fact-check ran the claim past renewable-energy researchers, and the numbers came back off by roughly two orders of magnitude. Turbine maker Vestas publishes life-cycle assessments showing a 2-megawatt turbine pays back its manufacturing, operation, and disposal footprint in about seven months of medium wind. A 2016 study put the figure at around 64 days for a 3.4-megawatt unit; a 2019 study averaged 5.3 months. Professor Alasdair McDonald of the University of Edinburgh gave Newsweek the tidiest verdict on Tommy:

"That character is misinformed and wrong," McDonald said — while conceding Thornton plays that guy very well.

Newsweek contacted representatives for Sheridan and Paramount for comment. The monologue stayed viral anyway.

Read more: Nathan Fielder’s A24 doc ‘A Secret’ spotlights Elizabeth Holmes—here’s who she is

What Landman gets wrong: Newsweek and a Texas trade group both published point-by-point rebuttals - image 1

The landmen grade their own show

The American Association of Professional Landmen took a friendlier but no less thorough approach. The AAPL had history with the production — the group supplied Sheridan with educational material, got the title corrected from "Land Man" to the industry's one-word "Landman," hosted a season 1 scene at its Fort Worth headquarters, and put staff in season 2 as extras. Then it launched Landman Now, a companion podcast that convenes credentialed landmen every Thursday after each Sunday episode to sort fact from fiction.

Their recurring corrections, across both seasons:

  • Landmen don't fix wells. Tommy sealing a burning blowout with a hammer in episode 2 is not in the job description — the job is negotiating leases and managing land agreements, not oilfield heroics.
  • Nobody negotiates with cartels. Incoming AAPL president Julie Woodard has said cartel dealings and emergency rescues "are not typical in a landman's daily life," which is a trade association's way of saying never.
  • The paperwork wouldn't hold. At a Texas Tech panel on the show, AAPL's Wade Maloy needled the very first scene:

"Where is the notary while Tommy is negotiating under duress?" he joked — the opening two minutes, he said, are full of technicalities.

  • The safety culture is inverted. Real crews stress that anyone on site, from geologist to well worker, has authority to shut down an unsafe operation. Tommy's improvised fixes would get a real M-Tex sued into the ground.

What both reviews say it gets right

Neither rebuttal calls the show worthless — quite the opposite. Houston Chronicle's own running fact-checks note the cartel presence in West Texas is real (a DEA initiative ending in 2023 made 235 arrests across 17 West Texas counties), just nowhere near planes-falling-from-the-sky levels. Working landmen credit the show for nailing the relentless phone calls, the 24/7 on-call culture, and the Midland–Odessa divide. One Lubbock landman confirmed Cooper's 75/25 royalty split is the modern industry standard, even if the show's $78-a-barrel crude ran about $18 above the actual 2025 market.

The scorecard, then: economics dramatized, chemistry exaggerated, job description rewritten for television — and the phone bill, apparently, dead accurate.

Earlier we wrote: Ben Shapiro’s viral The Last of Us recap prompts ‘embarrassed’ response from Nick Offerman

Read also

Cuttingsfg.com use of cookies We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. These will be set only if you accept. For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookie Policy