Tom Hanks Rejects Comparisons to James Stewart, His Acting Idol
Tom Hanks says he feels uncomfortable being compared to James Stewart, whom he considers the greatest actor ever. Hanks prefers to be likened to lesser-known stars, believing Stewart's legacy is unmatched and unique.
In the world of film, it ’s almost inevitable for actors to be measured against one another, even when they strive to carve out their own unique paths. For some, being likened to a Hollywood legend is the ultimate compliment. But for Tom Hanks, such comparisons can feel awkward—especially when the name James Stewart comes up.
Hollywood Stardom and Reluctant Comparisons
Throughout the 1990s, Hanks was everywhere. He picked up back-to-back Oscars for his roles in the powerful drama "Philadelphia " and the heartwarming "Forrest Gump," showing off his impressive range. Even before that, he’d made a name for himself with hits like "Big" and "Splash." The ‘90s, though, were when he truly became a household name. Whether he was lending his voice to Woody in "Toy Story" or leading the charge in "Saving Private Ryan," Hanks was the face of mainstream American cinema. He built a reputation as the reliable, everyman hero—someone audiences could always root for. Hanks was careful with his choices, steering clear of risky indie projects that might threaten his image as a leading man. That strategy paid off, cementing his place at the top of the industry.
Why Hanks Finds the Stewart Comparison Uncomfortable
At the height of his fame, Hanks was often compared to James Stewart, the classic star known for his relatable, down-to-earth roles. But Hanks doesn’t see this as a compliment to himself. Instead, he feels it does a disservice to Stewart’s legacy. He’s quick to admit that while he might have fit into a film like "It’s A Wonderful Life," he doubts he could have matched Stewart’s intensity in thrillers like "Vertigo" or "Rope." Stewart’s collaborations with Hitchcock had a special artistry that, in Hanks’s view, set him apart from his peers.
“I get embarrassed every time that comes up. Jimmy was the best of all time. Comparing the two of us is like an insult to him, because, frankly, I’m lucky to be where I am. I’m just this really cheesy guy,”
Hanks once said. He even joked that he’d rather be compared to Van Johnson, a less celebrated actor, adding,
“Would that be considered an insult to Van? Should I be comparing myself to John Agar? Maybe that’s more appropriate. I just get uncomfortable when I’m asked to talk about myself. There are a lot more talented actors out there.”
Shared Qualities, Different Legacies
Whether or not you think Hanks matches Stewart’s talent, it’s easy to see why people draw parallels. Both actors have built careers on playing likable, trustworthy characters that audiences gravitate toward. They’ve each taken on villainous roles, but their reputations as good guys have remained intact. Still, Hanks insists that Stewart’s versatility and artistry put him in a league of his own, making any direct comparison feel unfair.